How does scientific knowledge production about the body, mind, and environment shape social inequalities?

My research program takes up this broad question in a variety of specific cases where scientists, experts, and leaders are attempting to address inequalities through scientific or technical fixes. I use interviews, ethnography, and archival methods to study the experts and leaders who (within constraints) make decisions that shape the lives of others. I understand inequalities in an intersectional way that attends to the co-constitution of race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability in the United States.

There are three main projects where I am currently exploring these questions.

Environmental racism

My dissertation builds on theories of environmental racism, which have generally focused on the inequitable distribution of pollution or other hazards, to consider how the management of environmental amenities and benefits is exclusionary. I argue that the way nature is cultivated in parks and nature preserves contributes to environmental racism by presuming that science is an neutral and objective way to understand nature. My research shows how this approach leads natural areas programs to inequity as the mere absence or mismanagement of nature, and to sideline community groups who do not have an inherent interest in science.

Health equity

Data-driven policies are seen as essential for achieving health equity because they offer calculable representations of racial disparities in heath, like rates of COVID-19 infection. In Chicago, local government actors employ metrics like these as stand-ins for racial inequity and intervene to correct them. However, the broader effects of systemic racism in employment and housing are not necessarily being addressed due to the focus on measurable outcomes. I have explored these themes in a project with Professor Claire Decoteau where we use the case of COVID-19 in Chicago to consider why policies that claimed to be acting to produce racial equity largely did so by pitching interventions toward epidemiological statistics rather than providing direct relief to Chicago residents.

Trans medicine

This line of research took up the case of trans medicine and the shift from psychiatric expertise, and the pathologies that came with it, to contemporary models of multidisciplinary gender-affirming health care that have proliferated since 2010 in the United States. My study of trans medicine was the first step in honing my theoretical interest in the intersection of expertise and social inclusion in efforts to use knowledge production as a tool for recognizing, affirming, and providing better health care to trans people. I conducted in-depth interviews with prominent mental health experts who revised the DSM-5 to replace gender identity disorder with gender dysphoria and significant archival research on gender-affirming care guidelines.

Select publications and products:

Cal Lee Garrett (2023) “Greenwork: The Devaluation of Labor When Caring for Nature.” City and Community

Find it here

Claire Laurier Decoteau and Cal Lee Garrett (2022) “Disease Surveillance Infrastructure and the Economisation of Public Health.” Sociology of Health & Illness 44(8):1251-1269.

Find it here

Cal Lee Garrett (2022) “Finding Natural Variation: Assembling Underdetermined Evidence of Gender Dysphoria, Doing Trans Therapeutics.” BioSocieties 17(1):28-52.

Find it here

Decoteau, Claire Laurier, Cal Lee Garrett, Cynthia Brito, Fructoso M. Basaldua Jr., and Iván Arenas (2021) Deadly Disparities in the Days of COVID-19: How Public Policy Fails Black & Latinx Chicagoans. Chicago: Institute for Race Research and Public Policy (IRRPP).

Find it here